<- blog

Better Fetch vs. 10 Web Scraping APIs

A deep dive comparing Better Fetch to ScrapingBee, ScraperAPI, Zyte, Bright Data, Firecrawl, Scrapfly, Apify, Browserless, Browserbase, and Jina Reader — on pricing, billing model, and what they cost when JavaScript and anti-bot kick in.

#better-fetch#web-scraping#comparison

Every web scraping API looks cheap on its pricing page. Then you turn on JavaScript rendering, hit a Cloudflare-protected site, and discover your "$49 for 100,000 requests" plan actually bought you about 6,600 usable scrapes. The headline number was for plain HTML on easy targets — which is almost never what you're scraping.

That gap between advertised and effective price is the single most important thing to understand before you pick a provider. So this comparison leads with it. I built Better Fetch because I was tired of credit-multiplier math, so I'm not a neutral party here — but the prices and billing models below are all from the providers' own pages (verified June 2026), and I link to every one so you can check my work and theirs.

What I'm actually comparing#

These ten are the providers people most often weigh Better Fetch against, but they aren't all the same kind of tool. Roughly three camps:

Better Fetch sits in the first camp but is priced like none of them: flat per-call, no credit multipliers. That's the thread running through everything below.

1. ScrapingBee#

// website
scrapingbee.com
// pricing
From $49/mo (150,000 credits)
// model
Credits — 1 HTML / 5 JS / 10–75 premium
// best for
Teams already invested in its ecosystem

ScrapingBee is one of the most established names, with a polished API and good docs. The catch is baked into the credit table: JavaScript rendering is on by default and costs 5 credits, so most people burn 5× from their first request without noticing. On the $49 Freelance plan, 150,000 credits is ~30,000 JS scrapes, and premium domains (the protected sites you actually struggle with) run 10–75 credits each.

// strengths

  • +Mature, well-documented API
  • +Reliable on mainstream targets
  • +Good language SDKs

// trade-offs

  • JS rendering silently costs 5× credits
  • Premium domains 10–75 credits — the hard sites cost the most
  • Effective per-page cost climbs fast with real workloads

Where Better Fetch wins: one call is one call. Rendering a JS-heavy, Cloudflare-protected page costs the same as fetching plain HTML — no 5× multiplier, no "premium domain" surcharge on exactly the sites you bought the tool for.

2. ScraperAPI#

// website
scraperapi.com
// pricing
From $49/mo (100,000 credits)
// model
Credits — JS rendering ~5–10×, anti-bot stacks on top
// best for
High-volume scraping of mainstream sites

ScraperAPI's pricing has the same shape. A basic request is 1 credit, but render=true pushes it to 5–10, and difficult targets stack further: their own docs use an Amazon example where a request lands at 15 credits. Your 100,000-credit plan becomes ~6,667 requests on hard targets. It's a capable product — but the headline number assumes a workload you probably don't have.

// strengths

  • +Strong at scale on common sites
  • +Automatic proxy rotation and retries
  • +Generous concurrency on higher tiers

// trade-offs

  • JS rendering is a 5–10× credit multiplier
  • Hard targets can hit 15+ credits per request
  • Effective request count is a fraction of the headline credits

Where Better Fetch wins: no multiplier stacking. You don't need a spreadsheet to predict your bill, because difficulty doesn't change the price of a call.

3. Zyte API#

// website
zyte.com
// pricing
Pay-as-you-go from $0 ($100 cap)
// model
Per 1,000 responses, 5 difficulty tiers
// best for
Enterprise teams that want granular tier control

Zyte (formerly Scrapinghub, the people behind Scrapy) is the most enterprise-grade option here, and genuinely good. It bills per successful response across five difficulty tiers: from $0.13 per 1,000 simple requests up to $16.08 per 1,000 for browser-rendered Tier 5 sites. That's fair and transparent — but it means your cost is a moving target you can't fully predict, and the tooling assumes scraping expertise.

// strengths

  • +Pay only for successful responses
  • +Transparent published tier rates
  • +Deep, battle-tested scraping stack

// trade-offs

  • Five-tier pricing makes costs hard to forecast
  • Browser rendering on hard sites up to $16/1K
  • Steeper learning curve; built for scraping specialists

Where Better Fetch wins: simplicity. One flat per-call rate beats five tiers when you just want rendered HTML, a screenshot, and Cloudflare handled without becoming a scraping expert first.

4. Bright Data Web Unlocker#

// website
brightdata.com
// pricing
~$3–$12.60 per 1,000 successful requests
// model
Per successful request + proxy bandwidth
// best for
Massive-scale operations with a procurement team

Bright Data is the 800-pound gorilla of the proxy world — enormous IP pool, near-everything unlockable. Web Unlocker is priced per successful request (roughly $3–$12.60 per 1,000 depending on difficulty), often plus proxy bandwidth depending on configuration. It's powerful and it works, but the platform is sprawling, the contracts and KYC are heavyweight, and it's overkill for anyone not operating at serious scale.

// strengths

  • +Best-in-class unlocking success rates
  • +Massive residential/mobile IP pool
  • +Handles targets nothing else can

// trade-offs

  • Complex platform with a real learning curve
  • KYC/compliance friction to get started
  • Pricing and add-ons hard to reason about for small teams

Where Better Fetch wins: time-to-first-call. You can be fetching a Cloudflare-protected page in five minutes with a single API key, not a sales call and a compliance review.

5. Firecrawl#

// website
firecrawl.dev
// pricing
Free; Hobby $16/mo; Standard $83/mo
// model
Credits — 1/page, Stealth/Enhanced 5×
// best for
Feeding clean markdown to LLM/RAG pipelines

Firecrawl has deservedly won the AI-pipeline crowd: point it at a site, get clean markdown back, great for RAG. Core endpoints are 1 credit per page — genuinely cheap — until a site needs Stealth/Enhanced mode for bot protection, which is 5 credits per page. And on the Standard plan, credits expire monthly with no rollover. It's excellent at what it's for; it's less of a general-purpose "fetch any hard URL and also give me a screenshot and session" tool.

// strengths

  • +Superb clean-markdown output for LLMs
  • +Crawl/map endpoints for whole sites
  • +Very cheap on easy pages

// trade-offs

  • Bot-protected pages jump to 5× (Stealth mode)
  • Standard-plan credits expire monthly, no rollover
  • Optimised for content extraction, not browser-grade fetching

Where Better Fetch wins: Better Fetch is built for the hard fetch — Cloudflare clearance, real browser rendering, screenshots, sticky sessions — at a flat rate, rather than charging 5× exactly when a site fights back.

6. Scrapfly#

// website
scrapfly.io
// pricing
From $30/mo (200,000 credits)
// model
Credits — +5 JS/anti-bot, +25 residential, 60 screenshot
// best for
Developers who want fine-grained scraping control

Scrapfly is a strong, developer-focused product with a smart anti-bot engine (ASP). But its credit table is one of the most multiplied here: +5 for JS or anti-bot, +25 for residential, and 60 credits for a screenshot. Worse for forecasting, ASP can upgrade your proxy pool mid-request to beat protection — so a 1-credit call can silently become a 25-credit one. Credits expire monthly.

// strengths

  • +Clever automatic anti-bot bypass (ASP)
  • +Strong developer tooling and dashboard
  • +Failed requests are free

// trade-offs

  • Screenshots cost 60 credits each
  • ASP can silently escalate a call to 25+ credits
  • Monthly credit expiry, no rollover

Where Better Fetch wins: screenshots and anti-bot are included in the flat per-call price. A screenshot of a protected page is one call — not 60 credits plus a surprise residential upgrade.

7. Apify#

// website
apify.com
// pricing
Free $5 credit; Starter $29/mo
// model
Compute units (RAM × time) + per-actor fees
// best for
Reusable scraper 'actors' and scheduled jobs

Apify is really a platform, not a fetch API — a marketplace of pre-built scrapers ("actors") running on rented compute. You're billed in compute units (1 GB RAM for 1 hour ≈ 1 CU at ~$0.30 on Starter-class plans), and many store actors add their own per-result fees on top. It's wonderful if you want a turnkey "scrape all of X" actor and don't want to write code. It's a lot of conceptual overhead if you just want one URL fetched reliably.

// strengths

  • +Huge library of ready-made scrapers
  • +Built-in scheduling, storage, and orchestration
  • +Flexible enough to build almost anything

// trade-offs

  • Compute-unit billing is hard to predict
  • Store actors stack extra per-result fees
  • Heavyweight for a simple "fetch this URL" need

Where Better Fetch wins: Better Fetch is one HTTP call with one predictable price. No compute units, no actor marketplace, no estimating RAM-hours — just the rendered page.

8. Browserless#

// website
browserless.io
// pricing
Free 1K units; Prototyping $25/mo (annual)
// model
Units — 30s of browser time each; proxies/captchas extra
// best for
Self-driven Puppeteer/Playwright automation in the cloud

Browserless gives you hosted headless Chrome to drive with Puppeteer/Playwright. You're billed in units of 30 seconds of browser time, with reconnects counting as new units and proxies (6 units/MB) and captchas (10 units each) billed on top. It's the right tool if you're writing browser automation and want someone else to run the browsers — but you're still writing and maintaining all the automation, fingerprinting, and anti-bot logic yourself.

// strengths

  • +Full Puppeteer/Playwright control
  • +Good for complex multi-step automation
  • +BrowserQL and built-in captcha solving

// trade-offs

  • You build and maintain all the scraping logic
  • Time-based billing punishes slow pages
  • Proxies and captchas are extra units

Where Better Fetch wins: you don't write or maintain a browser script. The hard parts — rendering, fingerprinting, Cloudflare — are handled behind one call, billed per call, not per 30 seconds of runtime.

9. Browserbase#

// website
browserbase.com
// pricing
Free 1 hr; Developer $20/mo (100 hrs)
// model
Per browser-hour + Search/Fetch/proxy add-ons
// best for
AI agents that need to drive a live browser

Browserbase is the newest-feeling of the bunch, aimed squarely at AI agents that need a real browser session. Billing is per browser-hour ($0.10–$0.12/hr overage) with add-on line items for Search ($7/1K), Fetch ($1/1K), and proxy bandwidth ($10–$12/GB). Like Browserless, it's infrastructure you drive — excellent for agentic workflows, but you're still orchestrating the session and handling site defenses yourself.

// strengths

  • +Built for AI-agent browser control
  • +Generous concurrency on paid tiers
  • +Clean session/observability model

// trade-offs

  • You drive the browser and handle anti-bot yourself
  • Several separate usage line items to track
  • Browser-hour billing is unpredictable for bursty work

Where Better Fetch wins: for "just get me this page, rendered and unblocked," a single flat-priced call beats renting and orchestrating a browser-hour — and there's a Better Fetch MCP connector so agents can call it directly.

10. Jina Reader#

// website
jina.ai/reader
// pricing
Free tier (1M tokens); paid from ~$20/mo
// model
Token-based usage
// best for
Quick, cheap clean-text extraction for LLMs

Jina Reader (r.jina.ai) is the easiest to start with: prefix any URL and get back clean, LLM-ready text, with a real free tier and token-based pricing. For straightforward content extraction it's fantastic and hard to beat on price. But it's a reader, not an unlocker — it isn't built to clear Cloudflare, hold sticky sessions, route by region, or take screenshots of protected pages.

// strengths

  • +Dead-simple URL-prefix API
  • +Genuine free tier, cheap at low volume
  • +Clean text output tuned for LLMs

// trade-offs

  • Not built for anti-bot / Cloudflare-protected sites
  • No screenshots, sticky sessions, or regional routing
  • Rate-limited on the free tier

Where Better Fetch wins: when the page actually fights back. Jina is great until a site needs clearance or a real browser — that's the line where Better Fetch is the right tool.

The pattern, in one table#

Headline price tells you almost nothing. What matters is the billing model — because that's what determines your bill on real targets that need JavaScript and anti-bot handling.

ProviderEntry priceBilling modelPredictable on hard sites?
Better Fetch$19/moFlat per callYes — same price always
ScrapingBee$49/moCredits (JS 5×, premium 10–75×)No
ScraperAPI$49/moCredits (JS 5–10×, stacks)No
ZytePAYGPer response, 5 tiersPartly
Bright Data~$3–12.60/1KPer request + bandwidthPartly
Firecrawl$16/moCredits (Stealth 5×)Partly
Scrapfly$30/moCredits (screenshot 60×)No
Apify$29/moCompute units + actor feesNo
Browserless$25/moBrowser-time unitsNo
Browserbase$20/moBrowser-hours + add-onsNo
Jina ReaderFree+TokensN/A (no anti-bot)

Why Better Fetch comes out on top#

That's the philosophy, and it falls out of three choices:

  1. Flat per-call pricing. No credit multipliers, no difficulty tiers, no "premium domain" surcharges. The call that's hard for them is the same price for you. Plans are simple: Free (50 calls), Starter ($19 / 25K calls), Pro ($49 / 100K calls), Scale ($199 / 500K calls).
  2. Everything in one call. JavaScript rendering, Cloudflare clearance, screenshots, regional routing, and sticky sessions aren't add-on line items with their own multipliers — they're what a call is. Compare that to a 60-credit Scrapfly screenshot or Browserbase's separate Search/Fetch/proxy charges.
  3. No infrastructure to run. Unlike Browserless, Browserbase, or Apify, you don't write or maintain browser scripts, fingerprinting, or anti-bot logic. One HTTP call (or the MCP connector for AI agents) and you get the rendered, unblocked page back.

To be fair about it: if you operate at Bright Data's scale, need Zyte's tier-level control, or just want Jina's clean markdown for a RAG pipeline on easy pages, those are good tools — use them. But if you're a developer or a small team who wants to fetch hard pages reliably without a credit calculator open in the next tab, flat and predictable wins.

Pricing and billing models above were taken from each provider's own pages and public documentation as of June 2026. These things change often — click through and verify current rates before you commit.

Need technical help?

I'm a software engineer who builds web apps, APIs, and AI tooling. If you've got a project or a problem to talk through, book a free 30-minute call.

Book time with me ->